arXiv:2602.24086v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning models---including large language models (LLMs)---are often said to exhibit monoculture, where outputs agree strikingly often. However, we present two experiments that substantially disagree with prior findings of monoculture. In particular, we find that monoculture virtually disappears in one dataset when we include item difficulty compared to previous works that do not. Informed by these findings, we theoretically formalize what it means to measure monoculture. We show that monoculture is inherently subjective, relying on two key decisions: 1) the baseline null model for what "independence" should look like; and 2) the population of models and items under consideration. We conclude with concrete guidelines for future evaluators to ensure the robustness of their results.