Do Robotic World Models Really Follow Actions? Diagnosing and Aligning Action-Conditioned Generation for Policy Learning
arXiv:2608.24885v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Action-conditioned world models increasingly serve as learned simulators for robotic policy improvement, yet their reliability rests on an unverified assumption: generated futures faithfully reflect the consequences of arbitrary valid actions. Systematic evaluation against action-specific ground truth remains limited beyond expert demonstrations. To address this gap, we introduce WorldEcho, which evaluates action following over a broader action distribution through visual integrity and SE(3) end-effector trajectory alignment. Our diagnosis shows that expert-trained models perform better on demonstrated actions but struggle with off-expert trajectories, producing motion inconsistent with the commanded actions or visually invalid rollouts. To mitigate these failures, we propose WorldSync, which broadens action coverage, grounds intermediate video representations in action-induced robot dynamics through an Action-Forcing Expert, and aligns predicted and ground-truth changes under action interventions. Experiments show that WorldSync reduces integrity-gated error on RoboTwin and, when used for iterative policy improvement, yields higher success rates in simulation and on real robots.
Get stories like this every Monday
The week's most important AI news in one email. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Score: 2.82
Engagement proxy: 0
Canonical link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.24885