Why university lecturers are turning to AI in classes | Letters
Dr Talia Hussain says there is no incentive for lecturers to invest hours preparing a module they may teach only once I disagree with the decision of lecturers to use artificial intelligence to create teaching materials ( ‘We could have asked ChatGPT’: students fight back over course taught by AI, 20 November ), though I understand the pressures and incentives that they are responding to. As a recent doctoral graduate, I can only get fixed or zero-hours teaching contracts. Each taught hour may take days of preparation that is not accounted for in the pay formula. I have developed material including work plans, assessments, reading lists and tutorial tasks for three different modules, requiring much more time than I was paid for. If I were able to reuse these materials, my time investment would pay off. Budget cuts and hiring freezes meant that I delivered these modules once. There is simply no incentive for someone to invest time in a module that they may teach only once on a precarious contract. Continue reading...
Get stories like this every Monday
The week's most important AI news in one email. Free, unsubscribe anytime.
Score: 2.02
Engagement proxy: 0
Canonical link: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/nov/25/why-university-lecturers-are-turning-to-ai-in-classes